Chingiz Khan is a well-known
figure in the country I am from. There is still a controversial debate around
the actual nationality of Temujin (his second name). Some say he is not
Mongolian, but Kazakh. He is known by his cruel methods, but personally, I believe
he simply was a respectful person and consequently possessed a great power over
other people.
A huge statue of Chingiz Khan has
been introduced on 14th of April in the heart of London next to
Marble Arch station. For me, the sculpture itself look really strong and
attractive.
Surprisingly, Labour group leader
Paul Dimoldenberg expressed his view by claiming that this particular figure is
known for being a killer and there’s no way this part of history should be
presented in the center of London.
Here are some of his comments:
He said the warlord had no known
connection to Westminster — and added that there are plenty of other more
suitable historical figures to honor.
“To erect a statue of Genghis Khan
at Marble Arch is a bizarre decision,” he said. “Especially when there are so
many others who have a real connection to Westminster and the Olympics and who
have improved the lives of their fellow citizens.
"What on earth were
Westminster’s Conservative councilors thinking when they agreed to a statue of
him at Marble Arch? Who’s next? Stalin? Pol Pot? Saddam Hussein?”
In fact, Westminster selected the
statue as part of its ongoing City of Sculpture festival, which aims to install
works of art across the borough in the run-up to the Diamond Jubilee and the
Olympic and Paralympic Games.
The artist Namdakov, author of
this peace of art said he wanted to honor the warlord on the 850th anniversary
of his birth and added:
Westminster’s deputy leader Robert
Davis dismissed the criticism, saying: “Our City of Sculpture festival seeks to
inspire, challenge and educate.
“Art is most successful when it
provokes a reaction or begins a conversation. The Genghis Khan equestrian
statue is a fine sculpture.”
So, despite variety of opinions,
the statue will stay on its place for a planned time, so that British people
and tourists will be able to become more familiar with this historical figure.
P/s my friends told me when they
went to this sculpture, there was no name and explanation around it and people
was wondering who is this person was. I hope it’s only temporary. If it’s not,
then there’s no sense in the whole debate around it as people don’t even recognize
who he is.

No comments:
Post a Comment